But, i hate 4 and 5k screens with audio like you wouldn't believe. When i buy my new computer, i was going to sell my imac 3.4ghz i7 quad (2600k basically), 32gb ram. So what i am thinking, and the point of this topic. because it's so easy to select midi channels it also means using all 4 "sid voices" of quadrasid is dead easy.
#VIENNA ENSEMBLE PRO 6 CPU SPIKES 32 BIT#
works perfectly.ģ) No more plugin wrapping, cause i can assign the pro tools plugin to a 32 bit VE server and use my ageing 32 bit plugins like the irreplaceable quadrasid. and just assign an aux in pro tools corresponding to the VEpro input. How clever is that!Ģ) I love the way it's so easy to use and just select any output for any instrument with one click. the special stuff.and i have tested all timing against the click and it is rock solid.ġ) You can add any plugin in VE Pro and if it has latency, it is automatically updated in PT PDC readout. so even doubling that with VE Pro, means you only have 6.2 ms latency to play your VI's, which is still totally acceptable except maybe for piano and drums.Īnyway. With a really good interface like thunderbolt apollo, the output latency at 128 buffer is like 3.1 ms. If you want to work at 64, the compromise is the default 2 buffers so 192 total, if you have PT at 128 then 1 buffer works fine for all scenarios. usage still a bit high when you start adding a lot of instruments. so 64 PT buffer + 64 on VEPro means you play VE PRO vsti's at 128 buffer. Look, if you have PT at 64 sample and no buffer, it's not worth using, cause it maxes out all 8 cores just by being active, on 1 instrument track, with no plugins anywhere.īut if you add 1 buffer it becomes usable. I never really realised till I gave it a proper run today just how clever it is. So far i have only used VE Pro6 Demo on the same macbook pro I have pro tools on.